on the writings of the late art critic Clement Greenberg, whose texts I have a love/hate relationship with. Greenberg touts modernism, and targets abstract expressionism as the art that will save your soul. Or something like that. Although he does not indicate that all art should follow these defined rules, he does believe that to be a painting, the picture prepared must adhere to these rules:
1. flatness- appear, reference, or convey flatness, 2-d not 3-d. Illusionism and realism are bad and try to make painting sculpture, straining the medium.
2. reference the frame- square canvases have a square shape or convey the idea of framing, this one is a bit tricky. It doesn't mean circle canvases must contain circles, but merely demonstrate an awareness of the frame
3. color/pigment- its good, use it, think Monet and the Impressionists and their use of color for optics. Greenberg liked optics and an interest in all-over color and the relationship of one color to another
So, in a general summary, Greenberg liked: Cezanne, Newman, de Kooning, Olitski (loved him), Pollock, among others
He abhorred: realism, photography, anything that attempted 3-d on a 2-d surface.
I wonder what his thoughts were on film...?
Okay, off to write my papers.